The petition seeking relief regarding the petitioner's service termination was dismissed as withdrawn by the Court upon the petitioner's application with liberty to agitate rights.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to agitate rights granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Sharma with Ms. Akanksha Kapoor and Mr. Pradeep Singh, Advs.
Versus
MADHUP VYAS COMMISSIONER & ANR
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
Mr. Gaurang Kanth, the learned counsel for the respondent relies upon the short affidavit filed by the respondents. He submits that in terms of this Court’s order dated 03.02.2011 in WP (C) 7626/2007, the petitioner was put back into service. His subsequent termination from service is not an issue in these proceedings.
In view of the above, after some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to agitate his rights as may be in law.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
MARCH 12, 2019
acm
Prem Chand Pandey
Madhup Vyas
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
