The Court discontinued contempt proceedings as the petitioner insisted on arguing the matter despite a suggestion to refer it for computation. The petitioner sought a remedy for disputed amounts deposited by respondents.
Contempt proceedings dismissed. Petitioner advised to seek other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
K S SETHI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Vivek Singh, Advocate.
versus
S HARISHANKAR & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI O R D E R % 05.12.2019
as may be available to him. Dismissed.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
REKHA PALLI, J
DECEMBER 05, 2019 v
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should be continued when the core dispute involves disputed financial sums requiring detailed computation.
K S SETHI
S HARISHANKAR
VIPIN SANGHI
REKHA PALLI
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
