In a crisp order, the court dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner who failed to qualify in an ASI Draftman examination. The petition was withdrawn after the respondents declared the exam results, with liberty to approach other remedies.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail other remedies available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
DEV DUT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sahar and Ms. Sunanda Tulayan, Advs.
versus
RAJEEV RAI BHATNAGAR & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate with Mr. R.N. Pareek, P/Officer CRPF.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
%
O R D E R 05.07.2019
VINOD GOEL, J.
JULY 05, 2019 ‘SDP’
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the public interest test warrant continued monitoring of the petitioner who was unable to qualify in the ASI Draftman exam.
Dev Dut
Rajeev Rai Bhatnagar
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
