The single bench disallowed the delay condonation application and disposed of two contempt-related filings. The main appeal sought leave to withdraw as it was not maintainable under Section 19, following D.N. Taneja vs. Bhajan Lal.
Exemption allowed subject to exceptions; delay condoned; appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21.
SHEKHAR PAL SHARMA ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate.
versus
DR D.N SHARMA & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 01.11.2019
C.M. No. 47414/2019
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
C.M. No. 47415/2019
By this application, the appellant seeks condonation of 27 days’ delay in filing the appeal.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
CONT.APP.(C) 12/2019
On it being pointed out that the present appeal is not maintainable under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in D.N. Taneja Vs. Bhajan Lal , (1988) 3
SCC 26, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to avail such other remedy as may be available in law. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
SANJEEV NARULA, J
NOVEMBER 01, 2019 B.S.Rohella
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the contempt appeal required condonation.
Whether the contempt appeal was maintainable under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
D.N. Taneja Vs. Bhajan LalReferred¶19
D.N. Taneja Vs. Bhajan Lal, (1988) 3 SCC 26 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHEKHAR PAL SHARMA
DR D.N SHARMA
VIPIN SANGHI
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
