The High Court allowed an exemption application, condoned a two-day delay filing application, and dismissed a continuing appeal as withdrawn by the appellant.
Continuing appeal dismissed as withdrawn; exemption application allowed; delay condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
SHIV KUMAR ARORA ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Priya Sarkar, Advocate.
versus
ASHWANI KUMAR ARORA & ORS ..... Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 24.10.2019
C.M. No. 46884/2019 (exemption)
C.M. No. 46886/2019 (delay)
CONT.APP.(C) 11/2019 & C.M. No. 46885/2019
from the Appellant who is present in Court seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal. He states that the Appellant shall pursue the applications preferred by him before the learned Single Judge.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
SANJEEV NARULA, J
OCTOBER 24, 2019 nk
SHIV KUMAR ARORA
ASHWANI KUMAR ARORA & ORS
VIPIN SANGHI
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
