Sir Christopher Hohn v. Ireo Fund I Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
SIR CHRISTOPHER HOHN
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mohit Rohatgi, Adv. (Mobile No. 99741400146)
versus
IREO FUND I LTD AND ORS
..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Shruti Arora, Adv. for R-5
CORAM:
SH. RAKESH KUMAR (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
IA no. 94/2019 (filed by respondent no. 5 u/s 151 CPC for condonation of delay in filing rely of the petition u/s 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996)
No reply to the application filed on behalf of petitioner and learned counsel for petitioner submitted that he has no objection in case the application is allowed in as much as the rejoinder to reply had also been filed on 07.12.2018.
In view of submission and averments made in the application, application is allowed.
Reply and rejoinder is taken on record.
Application disposed of accordingly.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 415/2018
List on 11.01.2019 the date already fixed. Matter is coming up before Hon'ble Court on 15.01.2019.
RAKESH KUMAR (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
JANUARY 08, 2019 NR
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sir Christopher Hohn
Ireo Fund I Ltd and Ors.
Rakesh Kumar (DHJS)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court