Respondents sought permission to sell property with court-registry access. Petitioner granted two weeks to reply; matter listed for 21.04.2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
LANDMARK PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT AND COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Shubham Paliwal & Mr.Manoranjan Sharma, Advs.
versus
ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED & ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr.Davinder N. Grover with Mr.Lakshay Mangla & Mr.Akshit Rastogi, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
% 25.02.2020 IA No.2614/2020 (by the respondent seeking permission to sell property)
REKHA PALLI, J
FEBRUARY 25, 2020/ gm
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners objecting to the application are given time to file a reply.
Whether permission for respondents to sell property and deposit proceeds with the Registry is granted provisionally.
Whether the matter requires further listing after notice is issued.
Landmark Property Development and Company Limited & Ors.
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited & Ors.
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
