The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction in the High Court of Delhi and was granted leave.
Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file before a court of competent jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD
..... Petitioner Through Ms.Kanika Baweja, Adv.
versus
RAJ-SNEH AUTO WHEELS PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R % 06.02.2019
I.A. No.1878/2019 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 34/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner when being confronted that this Court would lack territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present petition, prays for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file the same before the Court of competent jurisdiction.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 06, 2019/Arya
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd
Raj-Sneh Auto Wheels Pvt. Ltd.
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
