Interim order in O.M.P. 33/2018 requiring respondent to place reply on record, exchanging calculations within one week due to divergent opinions, and listing for April 1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
..... Petitioner
versus
VERGO SOFTECH LIMITED
..... Respondent Through: Mr.Akhil Sachar & Ms.Sunanda Tulsyan, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA O R D E R
% 18.03.2019 IA 3349/2019
The counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has filed its reply to the application, however, the same is not on record. The counsel for the respondent shall have the same placed on record after removing office objections, if any. If the objection is one of the delay, the same shall not be insisted upon.
The counsel for the petitioner prays for time to make submission on the reply.
As there are divergent opinions on the calculations, the parties should exchange their respective calculations within a period of one week from today.
List on 1st April, 2019.
Interim order to continue.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
MARCH 18, 2019 /rv
HCL Inf Systems Limited
Vergo Softech Limited
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
