The High Court of Delhi disposed of a petition by the petitioner against an official liquidator/IRP without addressing substantive grounded claims.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~CP-15
versus
SHUBHKAMNA BUILDTECH PVT.LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.A.Shekhawat, Adv. for the respondent. Mr.Shubhendu Bhattacharya, Advs. for the Official Liquidator.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH O R D E R % 10.01.2019
The learned counsel appearing for the respondent company sates that an IRP has been appointed by NCLT against the respondent company and claims have been invited.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will approach the IRP to file his claim.
Granting leave and liberty to the petitioner to take steps as per law, the present petition is disposed of. All pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.
JAYANT NATH, J.
JANUARY 10, 2019/v
MERINA COMMOTRADE PRIVATE LIMITED
SHUBHKAMNA BUILDTECH PVT.LTD.
JAYANT NATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
