Petitioner sought withdrawal of the present petition before the High Court of Delhi. The court treated the prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without a substantive analysis of the merits.
None, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
DLF HOMES PANCHUKLA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pravin Bahadur, Ms. Seema, Mr. Saurabh Seth, Ms. Shweta, Mr. Priyash, Advocates.
versus SUSHILA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA O R D E R % 07.03.2019
Learned counsel present on behalf of the petitioner submits that he seeks to withdraw the present petition, which is thus dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
MARCH 07, 2019/NC
DLF Homes Panchukla Pvt Ltd
Sushila Devi & Ors
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
