The petition was declared infructuous as the underlying suit was listed for orders. The petition and pending applications were disposed of without keeping them for further hearing.
Petition and pending application disposed of; order in the underlying suit to be passed on the fixed date or within two weeks if adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
DURGA DAS BANSAL & ANR
..... Petitioners Through : Mr.K.C.Jain, Advocate.
versus
SEEMA BANSAL & ANR
..... Respondents Through : Ms.Deepali Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R
% 01.05.2019
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent this petition has become infructuous and the suit bearing no. CS/575890/2016 titled as Durga Das Bansal and Another Vs Seema Bansal and Another is now listed for 02.05.2019 for orders. The learned counsel for the petitioner on the other hand submits this petition may be kept pending for the next date of hearing.
It is not necessary to kept this petition pending. The order be passed in CS/575890/2016 on date fixed and in case it is adjourned, the same be passed within two weeks from today. Accordingly the petition and pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
Order dasti .
YOGESH KHANNA, J.
MAY 01, 2019/ DU
Durga Das Bansal & Another
Seema Bansal & Another
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
