This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
..... Petitioner
Through : None
versus
RAJ KUMAR & ANR
..... Respondent Through : Ms.Anju Thomas, Advocate for R-2 Mr.Ashish Bansal, Advocate for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R
% 14.05.2019
It is stated this petition has become infructuous as the main suit filed by the plaintiff/petitioner has already been dismissed.
On the last date of hearing none appeared on behalf of the petitioner; even today none appears on his behalf.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending applications also stands disposed of.
YOGESH KHANNA, J.
MAY 14, 2019
VLD
Suresh Singhal
Raj Kumar
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
