In a bail application regarding NDPS offences involving heroin recovery, the Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner was unrepresented and the State had not examined all material witnesses.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; liberty to apply afresh after completion of trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
ALLAUDDIN @ MOHD. SUMAN ..... Petitioner
Through None.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State. SI Yogesh Kumar, Special Staff/SED.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 16.09.2019
driver and the petitioner were apprehended and it is alleged that 270 grams of heroin was recovered from the driver and 100 grams was recovered from the petitioner. In addition, further 350 grams had been recovered from the car.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2019 pkv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail given the failure of legal representation and the prosecution only examining six out of fourteen witnesses.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Allastdin @ Mohd. Suman
State
Vibhu Bakhru
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
