Mohd. Anwar v. State of NCT of Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application, the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because a report from the Trial Court stated that the petitioner had been convicted and sentenced.
In a bail application, the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because a report from the Trial Court stated that the petitioner had been convicted and sentenced.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
MOHD. ANWAR
..... Petitioner
Represented by: Mr. K.O. Pandey, Adv.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Kishore Kumar PS AHTU.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 09.01.2019
A report has been received from the learned Trial Court indicating that the trial has been concluded and the petitioner has been convicted. Learned APP for the State informs that the sentence has also been pronounced against the petitioner.
In view of the facts noted, present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 09, 2019 ‘ga’
MOHD. ANWAR
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court