Bharti Gupta v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12 & 13
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
O R D E R
The above captioned applications have been filed seeking anticipatory bail for the appellants.
Learned APP for the State submits that specimen signatures of the appellants have been obtained but have not yet been sent to FSL. She further states that at this stage, custodial interrogation of the appellants is not required.
In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed. With these observations, both the bail applications stand disposed of along with the pending applications. However, it is clarified that in case the petitioners are to be arrested, the IO will give 14 days’ prior notice to them.
BRIJESH SETHI, J
SEPTEMBER 17, 2019/ sm
Bharti Gupta
Prabhat Gupta
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court