Disposed
Manju v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Baord (Dsssb) & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/9911/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14.
Through: Mr. Y.S. Chauhan, Advocate.
versus
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BAORD (DSSSB) & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.3/ CBSE.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
%
O R D E R 07.01.2019
Learned counsel for the respondent No.3 points out that the next date in the case as shown on the website is 17.01.2019. Possibly that is the reason for learned counsel for the respondents No.1, 2 & 4 – who are the contesting respondents, not being present today.
Adjourned to 17.01.2019.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
JANUARY 07, 2019
B.S. Rohella
MANJU
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BAORD
CBSE
VIPIN SANGHI
A. K. CHAWLA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court