The petition was adjourned to a later date due to the counsel's personal difficulty. No substantive decision was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
ARUN KUMAR BHARDWAJ AND ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Proxy counsel.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr.Nikhil Goel and Mr.Gurpreet Hora, Advocates for SDMC. Mr.M.Tarique Siddiqui and Ms.Reetika Gupta, Advocates for R-3/RWA. Mr.Mohit Gupta, Adv. for R-4 with R-4 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R
% 11.01.2019
An adjournment is sought on behalf of Mr.Rajat Wadhwa, counsel for the petitioner, as he is in some personal difficulty today.
At request, the matter is adjourned to 26.02.2019.
G.S.SISTANI, J
VINOD GOEL, J
JANUARY 11, 2019 rb /
Arun Kumar Bhardwaj
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
G.S. Sistani
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
