The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, who indicated a desire to make a fresh representation.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55.
SMT. SUMITRA DEVI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Shukla, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Amrita Prakash with Mr. Hari Shankar Sharma, Advs. for R-1 to R- 5.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
%
O R D E R 05.08.2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not wish to press this petition and would make a fresh representation to the respondents.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In case, the petitioner makes
a representation, the same be considered and decided by the respondents.
We make it clear that we have not interfered with the impugned order.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
AUGUST 05, 2019 N.Khanna
SMT. SUMITRA DEVI
UNION OF INDIA
VIPIN SANGHI
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
