A writ petition was not pressed and disposed of as such with liberty, after petitioner submitted that they intended to challenge the impugned order before the appropriate forum.
Petition disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30.
BATRA ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajesh Jain, Adv. with Mr.Virag Tiwari, Mr.Ramashish, Advs.
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Satyakam, ASC with Mr.Akhil Dehlan, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 05.11.2019
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in view of the reply filed by the respondents, the petitioner wants to challenge the order passed by the respondents on 26th August, 2019 in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. Reserving this liberty, this petition is not pressed at this stage.
In view of this limited submission, this petition is disposed of as not pressed with the liberty as prayed for.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 05, 2019
‘anb’
Batra Enterprises
Commissioner of Trade & Taxes
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
