In a writ petition challenging a posting to Uri, the Court declined to interfere, granted time to report for duty, and noted the petitioner's right to accommodation retention.
Time granted to report for duty until 1st April 2019; lesser scope for accommodation retention considered favourably.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Gaurang Kanth, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 15.01.2019
3. The petition is disposed of in above terms.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
SANJEEV NARULA, J JANUARY 15, 2019
rd
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court should interfere with the hardship posting order of the CISF officer to Uri.
Whether the temporary relief granted in the interim order should continue effectively till the next financial year.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to claim accommodation retention benefits due to the hardship posting.
Raj Kumar
Union of India
S. Muralidhar
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
