Stating inter alia, that there was insufficient material to rule in favour of the Petitioner even so far far as his right to the property was concern A Letter patent Appeal was field against the said judgment which also been dismissed in terms of Order of the Division Bench dated 22.02.2005. Instead of disclosing all these facts the petitioner has joined this batch of Shopkeeper. Shop No. 182,87-348/2005 ostensibly as the Shopkeeper, Shop No. 116-A (Metro fortuned Panchkuin Road, New Delhi. The annals of the previous Litigation through her son, claiming to be a legal heir of Late Makhan Singh , (as the present petitioner would also be) has not been stated in the petition. Learned for the contends that this was because of the fact that subsequent to 22.02.2005. an offer has been made by the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited (DMRC) to allot her an allot her site. As already noted above, the letter was addressed to the 'Shopkeeper' and not to a particular person by name. Once the entitlement of Shri B.S.Bedi has been rejected, the petitioner must sink along with that sterile that sterile claim.
