Single bench order directing respondent Bank to finalize decision on petitioner's representation within four weeks and dispose of the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
MAHENDER SINGH DAHIYA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. S. B. Sharma, Adv.
versus
CHIEF MANAGER (ADMN) & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajesh Gautam with Ms. Sakshi Gaur, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R
% 05.07.2019
After hearing learned counsel for the parties at some length, I hereby direct the respondent-Bank to take a final decision on the representation dated 29.06.2017 within four weeks from today. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner within one week thereafter.
I hereby make it clear that if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision taken by the respondent, he may challenge the same before the appropriate Forum.
The petition is disposed of accordingly.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
JULY 05, 2019 /ms
MAHENDER SINGH DAHIYA
CHIEF MANAGER (ADMN) & ORS
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
