Dismissed

Mr. Ravi Negi v. Balvantray Mehta Vidya Bhawan Anguridevi Shersingh Memorial Academy - Second Shift & Ors.

Delhi HC1 Jul 2019W.P.(C)/6914/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking regularization of service and payment of arrears as premature. The court observed the petitioner was running a private business using school premises without intimation while on school rolls, leading to an initial inquiry. Consequently, the petition filed to avoid departmental action was rejected.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as premature due to allegations of running private business on school premises without intimation.

Mr. Ravi Negi Vs Balvantray Mehta Vidya Bhawan… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~7

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 6914/2019 & CM APPL. 28772/2019

¶4

MR. RAVI NEGI ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Pawan Piyush and Mr. Vaibhav Dabas, Advocates

¶6

versus

¶7

BALVANTRAY MEHTA VIDYA BHAWAN ANGURIDEVI SHERSINGH MEMORIAL ACADEMY - SECOND SHIFT & ORS.

¶8

..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Kalra and Ms. Meenakshi Kalra, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for GNCTD (Services) with Ms. Sakshi, Advocates for R-3

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 01.07.2019

¶11

Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to regularize the service of the petitioner on the permanent post of Office Attendant at par with similar employees working in the same post in Delhi Government Schools under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 and further seeks direction thereby to fix the grade pay of the petitioner in terms of the recommendations of the Seventh Pay Commission with effect from the date of appointment of the petitioner and pay to the petitioner the arrears of salary accrued in favour of the petitioner along with interest @ 12% accrued thereupon.

¶12

It is evident that a show-cause notice dated 28.05.2019 has been

¶13

issued to the petitioner and reply thereto has been filed and thereafter vide communication dated 22.05.2019, it is observed that the petitioner has been running a private business in the name of R.N. Traders since February, 2017 till date.

¶14

It is further observed that despite being on school rolls, the petitioner has engaged himself in some other business without any information to school/office. Further observed that the petitioner is using the school premises/accommodation for his business transactions. Moreover, the stationary material was purchased for the school without any intimation and has forwarded the bills for payment.

¶15

As stated by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent from the Principal of concerned school that the preliminary inquiry has been initiated and if required, the regular Departmental inquiry shall be conducted against the petitioner.

¶16

She further states that there is no regular post of Office Attendant and he has never been regularized. However, the present petition has filed just to avoid the departmental action to be taken by the respondents.

¶17

It is pertinent to note that the allegations made by the respondents have been disputed by the counsel for the petitioner.

¶18

In view of the above facts, the present petition is premature and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.

¶19

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J

¶20

JULY 01, 2019 rhc

Mr. Ravi Negi v. Balvantray Mehta Vidya Bhawan Anguridevi Shersingh Memorial Academy - Second Shift & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Ravi Negi v. Balvantray Mehta Vidya Bhawan Anguridevi Shersingh Memorial Academy - Second Shift & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Col Sandeep Ahlawat Vs Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Defence & Ors.

Shivangi Lal through Her Guardian/Father Mr. Apurb Lal Vs Central Board of Secondary Education

M/S Mayar Health Resorts Ltd. Vs the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner & Recovery Officer & Anr.

Sunita Bharti Vs Commandent of Army Hospital (R&R) through Oic Shops

Tarun Sood Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Manoj Arora Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation

Bankim K. Kulshrestha Vs Union of India and Ors.

Union of India & Anr. Vs Ram Swarup & Ors.

Pradeep Vs State & Ors.

Dinesh Kumar Rishi Vs the Vice Chancellor Chairman,Ececutive Council & Ors.

Kamlesh Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jange Ram Gondwal Vs Chiarman & Managing Director & Anr.

S. K. Pattanayak Vs Ministry of Railways and Ors.

Prema Sharma Vs Director of Education & Ors.