Petitioners sought to withdraw a writ petition citing orders from the Bangalore Bench of a Tribunal and the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition as withdrawn and vacated interim orders.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders vacated; hearing date cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34.
RUPENDRA PATHAK AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Manish Kumar & Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocates.
versus
DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R D E R
% 09.08.2019
C.M. No. 35950/2019
Issue notice. Mr. Sinha accepts notice.
By this application, the petitioners seek to withdraw this petition in view of the order passed by the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal in O.A. No. 170/00533 to 00534/2018 as well as the order dated 10.07.2019 passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in W.P. (C.) No. 25405/2018.
The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim orders stand vacated.
The date fixed earlier i.e. 18.03.2020 stands cancelled.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
AUGUST 09, 2019 B.S. Rohella
RUPENDRA PATHAK AND ORS.
DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ORS.
VIPIN SANGHI
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
