The single judge disposed of the writ petition holding that the issuance of a circular dated 04.09.2018 ensured transparent re-admission of failed students. The court found no need for further monitoring given the specific petitioners' case was resolved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: 3rd September, 2019
SOCIAL JURIST A CIVIL RIGHTS GROUP ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal with Mr. Kumar Utkarsh, Advs.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Hafsa Khan & Ms. Rudrakshi Deo, Advs. for GNCTD – DOE. Mr. Tapasvi Raj with Ms. Vibhuti Tyagi, proxy counsels for Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv. for R-7/UPSC.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral)
W.P.(C) 5765/2018
Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in pursuance of the order dated 28.08.2018 passed by this Court in this writ petition, especially as per the direction given in Paragraphs 2 and 3 of this order, a circular dated 04.09.2018 has been issued in continuation of earlier circular dated 27.08.2018. The circular dated 04.09.2018 ensures a transparent and
W.P.(C) 5765/2018 Page 1 of 2
consent based counselling for re-admission of failed and re-compartmental students from Classes IX to XII.
In view of the aforesaid circular dated 04.09.2018 issued by the respondents which is in continuation of the earlier circular dated 27.08.2018 and also looking to the fact that as per the prayer in this writ petition, Master Shivam has already been admitted in a Government school in his neighbourhood in Class IX for the Academic Year 2018-19, we see no reason to further monitor the admission of such types of students in this writ petition.
Hence, we dispose of this writ petition with an expectation that the respondents shall carry out their own directions given in the latest circular as stated hereinabove.
With these observations, this writ petition is hereby disposed of. CM APPLs. 26193/2018, 28395/2018, 34147/2018, 39116/2018, 18458/2019 & 22189/2019
In view of the aforesaid order, no further orders are required to be passed on these applications. The same stand disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
SEPTEMBER 03, 2019 kks
W.P.(C) 5765/2018 Page 2 of 2
Social Jurist A Civil Rights Group
Government of NCT of Delhi
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
