The petition was dismissed as infructuous after the filing petitioner retired. The Court expressed concern regarding potential harassment faced by the petitioner due to the litigation.
The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18.
GOPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Malhotra and Ms. Sonali Raj, Advocates.
versus
O I/C RECORDS BENGAL ENGINEERING GROUP (BEG) & CENTRE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Uniyal and Mr. Dhawal Uniyal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
%
O R D E R 04.07.2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the petitioner has retired, this petition has become infructuous. It is disposed of accordingly.
At the same time, he expresses reservation that on account of his preferring the present writ petition, the petitioner may be subjected to harassment. We hope and trust that no such eventuality will befall him.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
JULY 04, 2019 B.S. Rohella
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of given that the petitioner has retired.
GOPAL SINGH
O I/C RECORDS BENGAL ENGINEERING GROUP (BEG)
VIPIN SANGHI
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
