Petitioners sought absorption in Directorate of Education with seniority and service benefits. The Court treated the petition as a representation and directed respondents to decide within four weeks.
Directing respondents to treat the petition as representation and take a final decision within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
GEETA RANI AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Advocate
versus
DELHI TRANSCO LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Ms. Sakshi Shairwal, Advocate for R. Nos. 1 to 3 Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Manager (DTL)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R
% 17.05.2019
Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction as under:-
“Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ and to direct the respondents that petitioners be absorbed in Directorate of Education, Govt. of NCTD and further be accorded seniority from the date of initial appointment (in respect of order dated 14.07.2014 & 31.12.2014 as petitioners fulfils all the conditions laid down in order dated 14.07.2014) to the post on which the applicant is rendering services in school [situated in DESU residential Colony at Tripolia, Janakpuri & Saria Kale Khan (Vidyut Vihar)] and further the applicant be given a regular salary with all arrears and service benefits including ACP/MACP schemes and annual increment with all other service benefits available to regular employees of GNCTD working on the corresponding post to the post of applicant with all consequential benefits including seniority & promotion and pay &
allowances.”
For the aforesaid purpose, the petitioners have already made representations on various dates, however, the respondents have not taken any decision thereto.
Keeping in view the reasons stated in the present petition and the submissions of the counsel for the petitioners, I hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to treat the present petition as representation of the petitioners and take a final decision within four weeks from the receipt of this order.
Decision so taken shall be conveyed to the petitioners in writing and if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they can challenge the same before the appropriate Forum.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
MAY 17, 2019 rhc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for absorption with seniority and regular salary benefits should be treated as a representation and decided within four weeks.
GEETA RANI AND ORS.
DELHI TRANSCO LTD.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
