The petitioner challenged its blacklisting by the respondent. The court directed the respondent to dispose of the pending appeal within six weeks after hearing the petitioner.
Directions to dispose of the pending appeal as expeditiously as possible within six weeks after hearing the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
M/S NICHOLAS O'DWYERY AND CO. LTD ..... Petitioner
Through Mr Joy Basu, Senior Advocate with Ms Ritwika Nanda, Ms Devika Chopra, Mr Kanak Bose, Advocates.
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr Mukesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr P. Priya, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 14.05.2019
CM APPL. 22579/2019
W.P.(C) 5098/2019
decision in terms of the relevant policy, which is pending consideration before the Appellate Authority. There is no dispute that an appeal under the said policy is maintainable.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MAY 14, 2019 pkv
M/S NICHOLAS O'DWYERY AND CO. LTD
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
