Petitioner sought to withdraw writ petition regarding IRCTC debarment order which had expired. Court dismissed main petition as withdrawn and stay application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
M/S OURS AARIYA BHAVAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia and Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advs.
THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Mr. Sunil Malhotra and Mr. Akshay R., Advs. for R2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
After arguing for some time, Mr. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, learned
counsel for the petitioner states that as the impugned order was passed by the respondent IRCTC on the premise that the petitioner was debarred from participating in future contract / licence of Indian Railways for a period of one year from January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2018, which order has not been challenged and even otherwise, which period has come to an end, he would like to withdraw the writ petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
CM No. 20624/2017 (for Stay)
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 22, 2019 /jg
M/S OURS AARIYA BHAVAN
THE UNION OF INDIA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
