HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
Set aside of CIC order and provision of requested information within four weeks; Writ petition disposed of and duplicate CM list dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
After some submissions, learned counsel for the respondent states that
the respondent shall be satisfied if the information sought by him at serial No.2 and 3 (page 35) i.e. his marks in the written, typing and interview separately and also his position in the merit list for the post of Senior Assistant are given.
Mr. Ankur Chhibber, learned counsel for the petitioner states that if this is limited prayer of the counsel for the respondent, the said information shall be furnished to the respondent within four weeks from today.
Noting the above submission made by Mr. Ankur Chhibber, the learned counsel for the respondent states that the impugned order of the CIC be set aside. Ordered accordingly.
The writ petition is disposed of.
CM No. 18493/2016
Dismissed as infructuous.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 02, 2019 /aky
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI
SANTOSH KUMAR TIWARI
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
