On April 04, 2019, the Delhi High Court allowed the withdrawing of W.P.(C) 4096/2013 with liberty to file separate writ petitions. The interim order dated May 26, 2014 was vacated, and the pending application was disposed of.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file separate writ petitions. Interim order dated May 26, 2014 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
20 + W.P.(C) 4096/2013 & CM 9633/2013
VELAXAN & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Akhil Sachar, Advocate.
versus
THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr M.S. Akhtar, Advocates for R-3 and 4.
Mr Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. Ms Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R
% 04.04.2019
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
I.S. MEHTA, J.
APRIL 04, 2019/ rd
Velaxan & Ors.
The Union of India & Ors.
S. Muralidhar
I.S. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
