The Court disposed of the writ petition, noting that the petitioner had been removed from service during the pendency and his revision petition was pending, leaving remedies open in that proceeding.
None. The petition was disposed of allowing petitioner to seek remedies in the pending revision petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
SHASHI KUMAR SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Archana Gaur and Ms. Ridhima Gaur, Advocates for UOI
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
S.MURALIDHAR, J
TALWANT SINGH, J.
NOVEMBER 01, 2019/ rhc
SHASHI KUMAR SHARMA
UNION OF INDIA
S. MURALIDHAR
TALWANT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
