Disposed

Rahul Mohod v. the Union of India and Ors.

Delhi HC13 Aug 2019W.P.(C)/2727/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This PIL sought directions for adequate supply of Anti-Rabies Vaccines in Delhi government hospitals and clinics. The High Court directed respondents to ensure availability and procure vaccines as per law but disposed of the petition without specific quantity mandates, accepting general assurance of supply.

What did the court decide?

Direction to ensure adequate supply of Anti-Rabies Vaccines in Government hospitals of Delhi.

Rahul Mohod Vs the Union of India and Ors. — Public Procurement and Tenders | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~25.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2727/2019 & C.M.No.12564/2019.

¶4

Date of Decision: 13^th August, 2019 .

¶5

RAHUL MOHOD ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Dev P.Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms.Anubha Bhardwaj, Mr.Jatin Teotia, Advs. for UOI.

¶8

Mr.Anjum Javed, ASC with Mr.Devendra Kumar, Mr.Faran Ahmed, Ms.Priti, Advs. for R-2/DHS. Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Adv. with Mrs.Shashi Gupta, Adv. for R-4/EDMC.

¶9

Ms.Richa Dhawan, ASC for R-5/SDMC. Mr.Anil Grover, Standing Counsel with Ms.Noopur Singhal, Mr.Mishal Vij, Adv. for NDMC.

¶10

Ms.Mansi Gupta, Adv. for North MCD.

¶11

CORAM:

¶12

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

: D. N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral)

¶15

This public interest litigation has been preferred for the following

¶16

prayers:-

¶17

“a). direct the Respondents No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 to immediate supply of complete dose/ full course of life saving "Anti-Rabies Vaccine" in the all Government Hospitals of Delhi (in their respective jurisdiction) and further directions to appoint permanent team of an experts from the department of health for monitoring/supervising the regular supply of full course/complete dose of "Anti-Rabbis Vaccine" in the all

¶18

W.P.(C) 2727/2019 Page 1 of 3

¶19

Government Hospital of Delhi(in their respective jurisdiction), along with further directions to the respondent/respondents to disclose permanent team of an experts for monitoring on regular basis, on affidavit to this Hon'ble Court within time frame;

¶20

(b). direct the Respondent / Respondents No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 to make available /supply the full course of "Anti-Rabbis Vaccine" in all (i) Mohalla Clinic, (ii) dispensary and (iii) Delhi Health Services (running in Supreme Court, Delhi High Court and all District Courts for advocates) run by Government of NCT of Delhi or Central Government, within time frame;

¶21

(c). direct the Respondent / Respondents No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 to develop the mechanism to vaccinate the people / School children in school/University /College with Anti-Rabies Vaccine, through the special drive with expert team of doctors time to time further directions the respondent/respondents to disclose on affidavit to this Hon'ble Court within time frame;

¶22

(d). May issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ / directions / order (s) / guidelines to Respondents No.1, 2, 3, 4, 5and 6to Control and Elimination of Human and Animal Rabies (with due care and caution) from Delhi/India within the time frame;

¶23

(e). Without prejudice to the generality of the above prayers above, that this Hon'ble High Court also be pleased to issue as Writ of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, directing the respondent/respondents no. 1and 2 to disclose on affidavit to this Hon'ble Court the action taken report/inquiry/investigation if initiated/done against the company till date, which imported the inferior quality or Sub standard "Anti-Rabbis Vaccine" and supplied in the market to cause loss of human life at large scale for the above together with applicable within time frames.”

¶24

W.P.(C) 2727/2019 Page 2 of 3

¶25

We have heard the petitioner who appears in person and learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 – New Delhi Municipal Council submits that there is a requirement of 7200 such Anti-Rabies vaccines per annum for the hospitals under them and they have already placed an order for 7200 Anti-Rabies Vaccines.

¶26

We see no reason to ascertain as to in what quantity the Anti-Rabies Vaccines are available in each of the Government run Hospitals/Mohalla Clinics/Dispensaries. Suffice would be to direct the respondents concerned to ensure adequate supply of Anti Rabies Vaccines in the Government hospitals in Delhi.

¶27

Looking to this aspect of the matter and looking to the need of availability of Anti-Rabies Vaccines in the Government hospitals in Delhi, we hereby direct the concerned respondents to ensure adequate supply of Anti Rabies Vaccines in the Government hospitals in Delhi. In case the vaccines are not purchased, they may undertake the process of procuring these vaccines as per law, rules and regulations and Government policies applicable to the facts of the present case.

¶28

In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of along with the pending application.

¶29

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶30

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

¶31

AUGUST 13, 2019 ‘anb’

¶32

W.P.(C) 2727/2019 Page 3 of 3

Rahul Mohod v. the Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Mohod v. the Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Aggarwal and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Chogori India Retail Limited Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S Airads Limited Vs Union of India & Ors.

Abhijit Mishra Vs National Housing Bank & Anr.

Neeraj Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sita Devi and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

National Pharmaceutical Pric.a Vs Garima Seth & Ors.

Varaha Infra - Jceg (Jv) Vs National Highway Authority of India and Anr.

Abhijit Mishra Vs National Housing Bank & Anr.

Mark Splendour Nonwovens Pvt. Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner Central Excise

Department of Social Welfare Vs Association of Ex-Students of the Govt. Lady Noyce Senior Secondary School of the Deaf & Ors.

Santosh Kumar Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

United Shiksha Samiti Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Residents Welfare Association Vs East Delhi Municipal Corporation