Partly allowed
Prabhatam Advertisement Pvt. Ltd. through Its Authorized Reprentative v. Delhi Metro Rail Transport Corporation Ltd.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/2256/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court observed that since the respondent has already encashed the petitioner's security deposit via a notification under Clause 12.5 of the License Agreement, the petitioner's interim application to restrain the forfeiture had become infructuous. The main petition was remanded to the Roster Bench for a date.
What did the court decide?
Exemption on CM application allowed; Main petition remanded to Roster Bench.