Petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC seeking production of his wife. The court dismissed the petition as it was withdrawn after the petitioner's wife voluntarily expressed her wish to reside at her parental home.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUNIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Dalip Kumar Santoshi, Mr. M.L. Paliwal and Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocates.
versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal) with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate for GNCTD with Insp. Gulshan, HC Sushil Kumar, IO, PS Wazirabad.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA O R D E R % 07.01.2020
The present writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, instituted on behalf of the petitioner, prays as follows:
“The petitioner has filed the Habeas Corpus writ petition before this Hon’ble Court to direct the respondent No.1 and 2 to produce the wife of the petitioner.”
In view of the circumstance that, Ms. Shivani, the 22 year old wife of Mr. Sunil Kumar, the petitioner, has appeared before this Court and expressed her will to reside at her parental home at this
time, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions from the latter, does not press this petition, any further.
The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. The pending application also stands disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
I.S.MEHTA, J
JANUARY 07, 2020
as
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SUNIL KUMAR
STATE & ANR.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
I.S.MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
