Petitioner filed a writ petition which was subsequently withdrawn by the petitioner in the presence of the court. The court dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
NAVEEN BHATIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Abbot, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Vinod Diwakar, CGSC, Mr.Sayandeep Pahari, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 16.01.2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits upon instructions of the petitioner, who is present in the Court, that the writ petition may be withdrawn.
Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
PRATEEK JALAN, J
JANUARY 16, 2019 „hkaur‟
Naveen Bhatia
Union of India
S. Ravindra Bhat
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
