Petitioner challenged an order allegedly granting ACP benefits but stating pay remained unfixed. Court dismissed petition with liberty to approach appropriate remedy regarding the other order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
MANINDRA KISHOR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI. Mr. Vivek Kr. Singh, DC Law CRPF. Mr. Deepak Kumar, SI CRPF.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 21.02.2019
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
FEBRUARY 21, 2019/ ss
Manindra Kishor Singh
Union of India
S. Muralidhar
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
