Dismissed

Amit Sahni v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC2 Dec 2019W.P.(C)/13455/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This PIL invoked under Article 226 sought directions to ensure fairness and impartiality in the Sentence Review Board (SRB) functioning under CrPC Sections 432, 433, and 433(A). The petitioner submitted suggestions to anonymize cases, provide legal representation, video record meetings, and forward materials to the LG. The Court directed the respondent to examine these suggestions.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to examine the petitioner's suggestions regarding SRB functioning, provided in para 11 of the petition, in accordance with law and policy.

Amit Sahni Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~30

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of decision: 2^nd December, 2019

¶4

- W.P.(C) 13455/2018 & CM APPLs. 51227-28/2019

¶5

AMIT SAHNI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.A. Gupta, Mr. Amit Sahni, J.S. Sethi, Mr. Anshul Bajaj and Ms. Sonali Tiwari, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Shivani Vij and Ms.Dacchita Shahi, Advs. for GNCTD

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

¶9

O R D E R % 02.12.2019

¶10

D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)

¶11

W.P.(C) 13455/2018

¶12

This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers:

¶13

“i) To issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ of the like nature thereby issuing appropriate and mandatory direction(s) to the Respondent to implement the aforesaid suggestions made by the petitioner through his representation dated 26-11-2018, in order to ensure fairness and impartiality in the functioning of Sentence Review Board

¶14

W.P.(C) 13455/2018

¶15

Page 1 of 3

¶16

(SRB) and to avoid extraneous considerations to affect its decision.

¶17

ii) Pass any other appropriate order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶18

Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that there are various suggestions made in para 11 of the writ petition which are essential to ensure fairness and impartiality in the functioning of Sentence Review Board. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the Sentence Review Board is exercising powers under Section 432 to be read with Section 433 of Cr.P.C. subject to the limitations under Section 433 (A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to be read with Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 and therefore these suggestions are required to be incorporated in the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for both sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, we hereby direct the respondent to look into the suggestions of this petitioner as enumerated in para 11 of the memo of this writ petition. For ready reference, para 11 of the writ petition is reproduced herein below:

¶20

“11. That in order to avoid the extraneous considerations to affect the decision of Sentence Review Board (SRB) and for bringing fairness and impartiality in the functioning of SRB, the suggestions of the Petitioner, as suggested in the representation dated 26-11-2018, are as under:-

¶21

SUGGESTIONS

¶22

i) Cases of Life Convicts should be considered in SRB by giving each convict a number/code (concealing his caste, religion etc), so as to avoid extraneous consideration.

¶23

W.P.(C) 13455/2018

¶24

Page 2 of 3

¶25

ii) Right to legal representation must be also given to the convict(s), whose cases are placed before the SRB for the purpose of consideration for premature release.

¶26

iii) Meetings of SRB must be video-graphed.

¶27

iv) Entire material placed before SRB viz police reports, reports from jail, nominal rolls, report from social welfare department and other documents, must be forwarded to the Hon'ble LG for the purpose of taking an independent decision as to whether recommendations of SRB are in pursuance to the material considered by SRB or the same is affected by some extraneous reasons.”

¶28

We further direct the respondent to keep in mind the illustrations given by the petitioner in para 3 of CM APPL. 51227/2019 (page 308) while considering the suggestions given by the petitioner. The suggestions of the petitioner with regard to functioning of Sentence Review Board (SRB) will be considered by the respondent in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policy, applicable to the facts of the case.

¶29

With these observations, this writ petition is hereby disposed of.

¶30

CM APPLs. 51227-28/2019

¶31

In view of the disposal of the writ petition, these applications also stand disposed of.

¶32

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶33

C.HARI SHANKAR, J.

¶34

DECEMBER 02, 2019 dsn

¶35

W.P.(C) 13455/2018

¶36

Page 3 of 3

Amit Sahni v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Sahni v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar and Ors. Vs State of NCT and Ors.

Pankaj Bhargava Vs Union of India and Anr.

Executive Engineer P.W.D. Div. Vs Yogender Prasad & Ors.

Apfc Employees' Provident Funds Organisation Vs M/S Profolab

Union of India and Ors. Vs Madan Lal

Mukesh Raj Vs Union of India & Anr.

Somveer Vs Union of India and Ors.

Dharam Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

M/S Hudson Overseas Vs Commissioner of Customs (Exports) Icd, Tkd, New Delhi and Ors.

Manjinder Singh Sirsa Vs Union of India & Ors.

Dharam Singh Vs Delhi Transport Corporation

Ahmed Rasheed Siddiqui Vs Indian Red Cross Society and Ors.

Rohit Bhalla Vs Ministry of Railways and Ors.

Shri Sandeep Dahiya Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.