Partly allowed

Occupants Welfare Associates of Village Chirag Delhi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC4 Dec 2019W.P.(C)/12718/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Jayant Nath disposed of three connected writ petitions and CM applications filed by Occupants Welfare Associates of Village Chirag regarding disconnection of electricity and water. The court allowed recall subject to exceptions before dismissing all other applications as withdrawn, granting liberty to approach the ATMCD.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was allowed subject to exceptions. CM applications were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the ATMCD.

Occupants Welfare Associates of Village Chirag Delhi Vs… — Landlord and Tenant | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~A-37

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 12718/2019

¶4

OCCUPANTS WELFARE ASSOCIATES OF VILLAGE CHIRAG DELHI..... Petitioner

¶5

Through versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms.Anju Thomas, Adv. for Mr.Sunil Fenandes, Standing Counsel for BSES-RPL. Ms.Sunieta Ojha, Adv. for SDMC. Mr.Abhishek Kr.Singh, Adv. for the applicant in C Nos. 4702-04/2020 with applicant-in-person.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH O R D E R % 05.02.2020 CM APPL. No. 4704/2020

¶7

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶8

CM APPL. No. 4702/2020 (seeking recall of the order dated 4.12.2019)

¶9

CM No. 4702/2020 is filed for recall of the order dated 04.12.2019 pleading that the applicant was a necessary party in the writ petition and had not been impleaded.

¶10

This court on 04.12.2019 had noted that a communication dated 23.08.2019 has been issued by respondent No. 2 SDMC addressed to respondents No. 4 BSES and respondent No. 3 DJB whereby it is stated that respondent No. 2 SDMC has taken action under Section 343/344 of the DMC Act against the unauthorised construction. The communication also requests BSES and DJB to initiate action against the said unauthorised construction as per provision of law regarding disconnection of electricity

¶11

and water connection. A communication was also sent to SHO, PS Malviya Nagar.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has been residing on the ground floor of the property since 1995. He states that suddenly only the applicant has been singled out for disconnection of electricity supply.

¶13

The remedy for the applicant, in my opinion, is to approach the ATMCD to challenge the proceedings initiated by respondent No.2 SDMC under Section 343/344 of the DMC Act.

¶14

At this stage, earned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the ATMCD with an appropriate petition. 6. Granting leave and liberty as sought, the application is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶15

In case proceedings are initiated by the applicant before the ATMCD, the ATMCD is requested to deal with the interim injunction application urgently and pass appropriate orders as per law. ATMCD may deal with the petition of the applicant as per law uninfluenced by any observations made by this court in the order dated 04.12.2019.

¶16

CM No.4703/2020 (seeking directions to BSES to restore the electricity connection)

¶17

In view of the above, learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw this application.

¶18

The application is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶19

JAYANT NATH, J

¶20

FEBRUARY 05, 2020 rb

Occupants Welfare Associates of Village Chirag Delhi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Occupants Welfare Associates of Village Chirag Delhi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union of India and Ors. Vs Madan Lal

Mukesh Raj Vs Union of India & Anr.

Somveer Vs Union of India and Ors.

Dharam Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Smt. Promila Kumar Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 69(1) & Anr.

Jamia Cooperative Bank Limited Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Prem Singh Vs Northern Railway through Chief Commercial Manager (Pm) & Ors.

Deepak & Co. & Anr. Vs Indian Railways Catering & Tourism Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

Somveer Vs Union of India and Ors.

Deepak Sharma Vs Delhi Development Authority and Ors.

Anil Dutt Sharma Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Sh. Rakesh Rastogi and Ors. Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Ram Kishan & Anr. Vs Delhi Cantonment Board & Ors.

Deepak Chandra Vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr.