Rinisha v. N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Hearing not possible due to paucity of time. Matter adjourned for disposal on 14th January, 2019. No substantive decision.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 12462/2018 CM APPLs. 48376-77/2018
RINISHA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Ashima Mandla, Adv.
versus
N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Amit Bansal, Adv. for R-2 and 3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 09.01.2019
Owing to paucity of time, it is not possible to hear this matter today. Renotify for disposal at the end of the Board on 14th January, 2019.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RINISHA
- respondent
N.C.T. OF DELHI
Coram
C.HARI SHANKAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court