migrate to the GGSIPU on the same date, i.e. 22nd June, 2018, according to her, indicated that the requests for migration, in such cases, appeared, prima facie , to be orchestrated, rather than bona fide . As these aspects would require further investigation and inquiry, learned ASG exhorts this Court to hold its hands at this stage. The Court is unable to agree. Nothing unnaturally out of place can, in the opinion of this Court, be gleaned in the act of some of the students in obtaining NOCs, from the “parent” Colleges/Universities prior to the issuance of the Notice, dated 9th August, 2018, by the GGSIPU. Even if the formal Notice inviting applications for migration had yet to be issued, Clause 1.0 of Ordinance 7 was very much in place, and it is a matter of fact that, applying the said Ordinance, migrations were being allowed, by the GGSIPU, on a yearly basis. That apart, obtaining of the NOC from the parent University/College did not result, ipso facto , in cessation of the relationship with such University/College. It is not, therefore, as if the students had cancelled their admissions with the “parent” Universities/Colleges even before the Notice, inviting applications for migration, was issued by the GGSIPU on 9th August, 2018. The further submission of the learned ASG, regarding the A.P. Goyal Shimla University having granted mass NOCs on a single date, too, cannot be regarded as a necessary indicator of an orchestrated migration. There was no embargo on the said College/University granting NOCs to students, seeking migration, on the same day. The submission is entirely in the realm of conjecture and surmise. That apart, as learned senior counsel Mr. Munjal has correctly pointed out, the applications of several students, who were migrating from the A.P. Goyal Shimla University were
