Disposed

Deepak Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC1 Nov 2019W.P.(C)/11558/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge directed that additional documents in two writ petitions be taken on record. Relieving a submission by the respondents, the court ordered that petitioners would not be reverted until the stay application is heard before the Tribunal on a specified date.

What did the court decide?

Additional documents taken on record; petitioners not to be reverted until the stay application hearing on 14.11.2019.

Deepak Sharma & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:16.10.2024 15:53 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.

¶2

CM APPL. No. 47500/2019 (additional documents^ in W.P.(C) 11558/2019 CM APPL. No. 47511/2019 ^additional documents^ in W.P.(C) 11565/2019

¶3

Additional documents be taken on record. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C^ 11558/2019 W.P.rC^ 11565/2019

¶4

The present petition being W.P.(C) No.11558/2019 is directed against order dated 07.10.2019 passed in M.A. No. 3294/2019 in O.A. No. 2057/2019.

¶5

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the learned Tribunal has declined interim relief without taking into account the notice issued by the respondents on 22.10.2019. Counsel submits that in case effect is given to this notice, the implication would be that the petitioners would stand reverted.

¶6

Mr. Bhardwaj, leamed counsel for the respondents enters appearance on advance copy. Counsel submits that a careful reading of notice dated 22.10.2019 would show that time was granted to the petitioner-officers to make a representation within 10 days and some of the petitioners have in fact made such representations.

¶7

Mr. Bhardwaj submits that while he opposes the direction with regard to conducting a review DPC, however, the respondents would not revert the petitioners till 14.11.2019, when the stay application is listed before the Tribunal. 5. Plaving regard to the stand taken by the learned counsel for the respondents, the present petitions are disposed of

¶8

¶9

The stay application is already listed before the Tribunal on 14.11.2019, when the matter would be heard; and the petitioners would not be reverted till the next date before the Tribunal i.e. 14.11.2019.

¶10

For the sake of clarity, it is noticed that no separate M.A.s were filed in O.A.s Nos. 2057/2019 and 2977/2019, and these matters have been posted before the Registrar on 14.11.2019. We direct that these O.A.s be also listed on 14.11.2019 for hearing before the Tribunal and that in the meantime, the applicants in these O.A.s shall also file M.A.s seeking interim relief.

¶11

This order is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both the parties and would apply to W.P.(C) No.11565/2019 as well. 9. With these directions, the writ petitions are disposed of.

¶12

to both the parties.

¶13

G.S.SISTANI, J.

¶14

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.

¶15

NOVEMBER 01, 2019/m/

Deepak Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

9X Media Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs Union of India and Anr.

Ashok Kumar Vs Delhi Disaster Management Authority & Ors.

Pallavika Adeshra Vs Union of India & Anr.

Mohammad Musthafa Vs Union of India & Anr.

Vineet Wadhwa Vs Union of India and Anr.

Yogesh Khantwal Vs Union of India and Anr.

Aarti Khantwal Vs Union of India and Anr.

Mukut Pathak and Ors. Vs Union of India and Anr.

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs M/S National Building Construction India Ltd. & Ors.

Pallavika Adeshra Vs Union of India & Anr.

Mohammad Musthafa Vs Union of India & Anr.

Rahul Raj & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S Omaxe Ltd. Vs Harleen Kaur Anand & Anr.

Rajender Pershad Bhardwaj Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.