Dismissed
Yogendra Mittal v. Union of India and Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/1152/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
YOGENDRA MITTAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Mudit Jain, Mr. Deepanshu Choithani, Mr.Shailesh Pandey, Mr. Khurram Salim, Ms. Barkha Rastogi and Ms.Shephalie Ailawadie, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Pradeep Jha and Mr. Nikhil, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R % 04.02.2019
CM APPL. 5208/2019
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 1152/2019 & CM APPL. 5207/2019
The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 26.11.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (‘Tribunal’) in MA No.100/4817/2018 and 100/1945/2018 in Original Application No.100/1766/2018 pending before the Tribunal.
After some arguments, Mr. Aggarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition, under instructions.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with pending application with the direction to the petitioner that he shall co-operate in the inquiry proceedings and shall not seek any undue adjournment. In case, the petitioner complies with the aforesaid condition, it shall be open to him to seek early hearing of his Original Application. In case, such an application is moved by the petitioner, the Tribunal shall consider the same on its merits.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2019
nn
YOGENDRA MITTAL
UNION OF INDIA
VIPIN SANGHI
A. K. CHAWLA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court