The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Industrial Tribunal's award of Rs.50,000 compensation to the respondent, deeming the jurisdiction inappropriate and findings unsullied.
The writ petition is dismissed; the deposited amount of Rs.50,000 with interest is directed to be released to the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SYNDICATE BANK ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajesh Mehndru and Mr. Manmohan Singh, Advocates.
versus
SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal and Mr. Deepak Sinha, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
JUDGEMENT (ORAL)
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 11459/2016
respondent.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
APRIL 23, 2019 ak
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 11459/2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court would entertain a writ petition against the retrenchment compensation awarded to an employee by the Industrial Tribunal in a service dispute.
SYNDICATE BANK
SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA
J.R. MIDHA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
