A one-line order dismissing the petitioner's counsel's reply and granting respondents' counsel time to file a rejoinder, listing the matter for the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
M/S SPEED LINES PVT. LTD.
..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Madan Gera, Advocate
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR.
..... Respondents
Through : Ms.Puja Kalra, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA O R D E R % 11.02.2019
Reply has been filed. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to file rejoinder. Be filed.
List on 15th May, 2019.
YOGESH KHANNA, J.
FEBRUARY 11, 2019 VLD
M/S SPEED LINES PVT. LTD.
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
