Gul Hasan v. Rohit Malik & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
On settlement between the landlord and tenant regarding arrears and a tenancy lease in a Delhi property, this court disposed of the appeal and related applications on January 11, 2018.
What did the court decide?
Settlement agreed to; appeal and pending applications disposed off in terms of settlement and appellant's undertaking.
What the court decided
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- RSA 267/2017, C.M.Nos. 42603 to 42605/2017
GUL HASAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nishant Das, Ms. Vishakha Gupta, Advocates with Appellant in person.
Versus ROHIT MALIK & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikrant Choudhary, Mr. Diwanshu Sehgal and Mr. Prince Chauhan and Mr. Price Chauhan, Advocates for the Respondents with Respondents in person
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 11.01.2018
The learned counsel for the appellant (lessee) submits that during the tenure of his tenancy in the suit property i.e. A-20, Sarai Peepal Thala Extension, Khasra No. 429/135/1, Ground Floor, Adarsh Nagar, G.T. Road, Delhi, he had carried out major renovations in the leased premises resulting in enhancement of its usability and economic value; that there was an oral agreement between the lessor and the lessee to the effect that upon expiry of the subsisting tenure, the tenant would be allowed to continue for a like tenure on the same lease rent, especially since he had made the renovations/ improvements in the premises at his own cost which was to enure to the benefit of the lessor, but the tenant was suddenly asked to vacate the
premises; nevertheless the tenant is ready and willing to pay 50% enhanced/ market rent i.e. Rs.7,500/- per month.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
GUL HASAN
- respondent
ROHIT MALIK
- respondent
ANR
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court