The High Court of Delhi disposed of an appeal and other pending applications as withdrawn after learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he would not press the appeal.
The appeal and all pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~76
versus
SATISH JAIN & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Hemant Chaudhri and Mr Arjun Bhaskar, Advs
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
CAV 602/2018
Mr Hemant Chaudhri, learned counsel for the caveator/respondents has put in appearance.
Caveat stands discharged.
CM No. 26396/2018 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
RFA(OS) 43/2018 and CM Nos. 26394/2018 (stay) and 26395/2018 (delay)
The present appeal is directed against the orders dated 10.04.2018 and 04.05.2017. After some hearing in the matter, learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, submits that he would not press this appeal but would seek such remedies as available to the appellant in accordance with law.
In view of the statement made in Court today, the appeal and all pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
G.S.SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J JULY 10, 2018 SU RFA(OS) 43/2018 page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal and pending applications should be allowed to proceed or dismissed as withdrawn.
Parmod Kumar Jain
Satish Jain & Ors
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
