In a default appeal, the Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against non-prosecution and ordered the release of deposited amount to the respondent pending undertaking for restitution.
Deposit released to respondent subject to undertaking for restitution if appeal succeeds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-144
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVAIR INTERNATIONAL LTD. ..... Appellant Through: None.
versus
PACIFIC FURNISHERS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Afrab Rasheed, Advocate (Mobile No. 9810122399).
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
O R D E R % 03.12.2018
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
DECEMBER 03, 2018
AK
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
NilReferred¶1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Novaire International Ltd.
Pacific Furnishers
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
