The High Court of Delhi disposed of an appeal on consent. The impugned judgment sustaining the lower court's decision was upheld, with a one-year grace period granted to the appellant for payment in three installments.
Appellant granted one year time to pay decretal amount in three installments; appeal disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JAGDISH SINGH LOCHAB (DECEASED) THR LRS
..... Appellants Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Beniwal, Advocate.
versus
PUSHPA SAROHA ..... Respondent Through: Advocate (appearance not given).
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
O R D E R % 04.09.2018
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
SEPTEMBER 04, 2018
AK
Jagdish Singh Lochab (Deceased) Thru LRS
Pushpa Saroha
Valmikaji Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
